Editorial assessment
The editor checks scope, completeness, originality and basic ethical requirements.
Editorial standards
Peer review process
A fair, constructive and independent review process designed to protect the quality of published research.
From submission to decision
Careful review. Clear decisions.
Every manuscript is assessed by the editorial team before being sent to appropriate independent reviewers. Decisions are based on originality, methodological soundness, ethical integrity, relevance and clarity.
Independent evaluation
Qualified reviewers assess the manuscript and provide constructive comments for the authors and editor.
Revision and outcome
The editor communicates a decision, which may include acceptance, revision or rejection based on the evidence.
Our commitment: Reviewers are expected to maintain confidentiality, declare conflicts of interest and treat every submission respectfully.